【】on Monday for over 16 hours.
Despite how much we all love it, Wikipedia is not a credible source. That's because any one can edit content at any time, adding in falsehoods that can sit there until, well, someone notices.。
Case in point: a page dedicated to the bibliography of Hillary Clinton redirected to Adolf Hilter's autobiography 。 Case in point: a page dedicated to the bibliography of Hillary Clinton redirected to Adolf Hilter's autobiography。Mein Kampf 。
on Monday for over 16 hours. 。
SEE ALSO:Facebook isn't alone—moderating the internet is basically impossible。
According to the edit history, the page was edited to redirect at 6:26 a.m. UTC, which is 2:26 a.m. ET. When you edit a Wikipedia entry, your IP address is logged and is publicly facing. We plugged that address into a tool that provides clues about who's behind the IP, including details about their Internet Service Provider.。


Looking up the IP address, the editor of the post was using Comcast's internet service, somewhere near Mount Laurel, New Jersey when they made the changes. Looks like someone had a late night messing with Clinton's bibliography. 。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。
Thanks for signing up!。
In a time where "fake news" is a household phrase, and popular opinion -- not facts --can sway elections and the stock exchange, it's incredibly important that accurate information be out there on a site such as Wikipedia, even if this was just an unfunny and weak attempt at trolling.。

To be fair to Wikipedia, this was not the Clinton's main page, but a sub page for books that she has penned located way at the bottom of her extremely extensive entry. Additionally, the bibliography page hasn't been edited in nearly a month.。
It's unclear how often Clinton's page gets trolled, but it's indeed low-hanging fruit given Wikipedia's editing free-for-all. Wikipedia, which is monitored by tens of thousands of volunteer editors, has yet to respond to inquiries about the edit. 。
While Wikipedia is a massive site that gets a TON of readers every day, we could only find one tweet in reference to the edit. 。
Tweet may have been deleted 。
At 6:00 p.m. ET, just minutes after Mashable emailed a request for comment, the edit had been restored by Wikipedia user Gfoley4. According to their bio, they spend their time "on Wikipedia reverting vandalism, reviewing AFC submissions, and working on transit-related articles."。
UPDATE: May 22, 2017, 5:40 p.m. PDT。
A spokesperson for Wikipedia, the nonprofit that supports Wikipedia, responded to Mashable's request for comment, confirming that the page was vandalized, then restored by a volunteer editor.。
Vandalism does happen from time to time on Wikipedia, but we find that the vast majority of articles are not vandalized. When vandalism does occur, it is typically reverted within minutes. In this case, the vandalism may have remained longer (less than 24 hours) because the article is relatively low traffic, averaging 34 pageviews per day.。
Featured Video For You。
相关文章

WhatsApp announces plans to share user data with Facebook
Big changes are coming to WhatsApp.。On Thursday, WhatsApp announced in a blog post it will begin sha2026-03-15
Pollution in New Delhi is so bad it's a health emergency
Pollution in India's capital is at obscenely dangerous levels.Last year, smog in New Delhi covered t2026-03-15
Reddit bans board where men posted misogynistic content and even advocated rape
Reddit's crackdown on violent content continues with the ban of a board called "Involuntary Celibate2026-03-15
Apple has shipped way more iPhone 7s than iPhone 8s, says report
Apple rolled the dice and released two new versions of the iPhone this year, and so far, that strate2026-03-15
Snapchat is about to explode in popularity, report says
Snapchat is about to have a couple of really good years.。The company will see huge gains in the numb2026-03-15
Before ending its print edition, Teen Vogue got in one last dream editor under the wire. Hillary Cli2026-03-15


最新评论