【】as a source only in limited situations.

Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。
Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the。Daily Mail 。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable."。
SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending 。The。 Daily Mail。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the。 Daily Mail 。Daily Mail 。
. 。

Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews. 。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the 。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。Thanks for signing up!。

Daily Mail 。
, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people."。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock 。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication." 。
The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail 。
is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page. 。 The ruling does not mean the 。Mail 。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source.。 The。 Mail 。joins the。 National Enquirer。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular.。
The Sun 。
and the。
Daily Mirror。
are also seen as unreliable. Wikipedia also warns against using state-run media like China's Xinhua or Iran's Press TV as sources.。Additional reporting by Jason Abbruzzese. 。Featured Video For You。Even Fox News is defending CNN against Trump。
相关文章
We asked linguists if Donald Trump speaks like that on purpose
Donald Trump may do a good "drunk uncle at Thanksgiving" impersonation at his rallies, but amid all2025-09-14- 禍從口出患從口入 ,這句古話說得非常有道理 ,因為最新的醫學研究發現 ,人體上的絕大多數疾病都是“吃”來的 。所以為了健康,我們一定要吃得健康。而吃得健康 ,我們最好能夠自己下廚 。下麵 ,就請大家先跟我學一下怎麽2025-09-14
- 定期去旅遊,當作給自己的獎賞。到外麵看看風景 ,也可以愉悅自己 ,從而更加健康。而外出遊玩 ,必然會享受到“舌尖上的美食”,你必然會留戀。而留戀之餘 ,你或許可以自己在家學著做。那麽,現在我就給大家介紹一下香2025-09-14
- 在外麵吃飯表麵上看是省心了 ,從健康角度來看,一種極壞的習慣。關愛身心健康,就要從飲食開始。所以跟小編學習一下健康香蕉燕麥蛋糕的做法 。1.1全部材料用攪拌機打勻 ,最後加發粉 。2.2原料3.預熱烤箱1802025-09-14
- With the Pokémon Go fever still shaking half the world, there's bound to be plenty of trainer2025-09-14
- 癌症肆虐的今天 ,你是否也感到過害怕 。癌症這一可怕的疾病 ,為什麽離人類越來越近?飲食因素起到決定性的作用 。所以 ,遠離癌症 ,首先要做的就是健康飲食。而健康飲食的第一布 ,你需要自己在家做。下麵,就讓小編來給2025-09-14
最新评论