【】as a source only in limited situations.

Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia. 。
Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the。Daily Mail 。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable."。
SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending。The 。 Daily Mail 。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail。
.。

Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews.。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。Thanks for signing up! 。

Daily Mail。
, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people."。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication."。
The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail。
is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page.。 The ruling does not mean the。Mail。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source.。 The。 Mail 。joins the。 National Enquirer 。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular.。
The Sun。
and the。
Daily Mirror 。
are also seen as unreliable. Wikipedia also warns against using state-run media like China's Xinhua or Iran's Press TV as sources. 。Additional reporting by Jason Abbruzzese. 。Featured Video For You 。Even Fox News is defending CNN against Trump 。
相关文章
One of the most controversial power struggles in media comes to a close
One of the world's biggest media companies has been embroiled in a complex personal and professional2025-07-31- 《女兒2》張恒舊照曝光遭鄭爽打趣:“長得跟房地產銷售一樣”2019-10-02 13:59:30 來源:大眾娛樂網 責任編輯: saisai2025-07-31
- 《無主之城》今晚收官 劉奕君突破演繹獲喜愛好評2019-08-09 14:41:17 來源:大眾娛樂網 責任編輯: 蕭鑫2025-07-31
- 《將夜2》今晚開播 王鶴棣宋伊人共啟江湖征程2020-01-13 10:35:15 來源:大眾娛樂網 責任編輯: lyz0862025-07-31
MashReads Podcast: What makes a good summer read?
Summer is coming to a close and that means one thing -- last-minute vacations! 。SEE ALSO:'Ice Cream B2025-07-31比心陪練聯合愛奇藝《慶餘年》舉辦聲優配音賽 ,開創影視劇吸粉固粉新方式
比心陪練聯合愛奇藝《慶餘年》舉辦聲優配音賽 ,開創影視劇吸粉固粉新方式2020-01-10 10:10:53 來源:大眾娛樂網 責任編輯: lyz0862025-07-31
最新评论