【】as a source only in limited situations.

  发布时间:2026-01-29 18:05:20   作者:玩站小弟   我要评论
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。Editors for the site (who are all volunteer 。

Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。

Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the。Daily Mail。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable."。

SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending 。

The 。 Daily Mail。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail 。

.。

Mashable Games

Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews. 。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the 。

Daily Mail。as a source only in limited situations. 。Mashable Top StoriesStay connected with the hottest stories of the day and the latest entertainment news.Sign up for Mashable's Top Stories newsletter。

By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。Thanks for signing up! 。

Mashable ImageOne user commented with a "strong oppose" comment that "The 。

Daily Mail。

, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people."。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock 。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication."。

The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail。

is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page. 。 The ruling does not mean the 。Mail 。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source.。 The。 Mail。joins the 。 National Enquirer 。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular. 。

The Sun。


and the 。
Daily Mirror。
are also seen as unreliable. Wikipedia also warns against using state-run media like China's Xinhua or Iran's Press TV as sources. 。Additional reporting by Jason Abbruzzese.。Featured Video For You  。Even Fox News is defending CNN against Trump 。
  • Tag:

相关文章

  • One of the most controversial power struggles in media comes to a close

    One of the world's biggest media companies has been embroiled in a complex personal and professional
    2026-01-29
  • 身體某個部位一跳一跳是怎麽回事 ?

    身體的健康是基本 ,我們有了健康的身體後才能去做其他的,我們平時要盡量養成良好的生活習慣 。有的人身體某個部位出現了一跳一跳的表現 ,這樣的現象比較常見  ,很多朋友不知道這樣的現象是怎麽回事 ,擔心對身體會造成
    2026-01-29
  • 耳朵上長了個血管瘤是為什麽?

    有一些家長在照顧孩子的過程中會發現孩子的耳朵後麵突然出現了一塊紅顏色的東西,就是皮膚裏麵的那一種,因為沒有實際的醫學經驗 ,所以家長就會感覺到十分的恐慌 ,不知道該怎麽辦才好,也不敢亂吃藥。排除一些皮膚疾
    2026-01-29
  • 身體某個部位一跳一跳是怎麽回事?

    身體的健康是基本 ,我們有了健康的身體後才能去做其他的 ,我們平時要盡量養成良好的生活習慣。有的人身體某個部位出現了一跳一跳的表現  ,這樣的現象比較常見 ,很多朋友不知道這樣的現象是怎麽回事,擔心對身體會造成
    2026-01-29
  • Two astronauts just installed a new parking spot on the International Space Station

    UPDATE: Aug. 19, 2016, 2:04 p.m. EDT 。 Astronauts Kate Rubins and Jeff Williams are back in the Inter
    2026-01-29
  • 耳朵上長了個血管瘤是為什麽?

    有一些家長在照顧孩子的過程中會發現孩子的耳朵後麵突然出現了一塊紅顏色的東西 ,就是皮膚裏麵的那一種,因為沒有實際的醫學經驗,所以家長就會感覺到十分的恐慌,不知道該怎麽辦才好,也不敢亂吃藥 。排除一些皮膚疾
    2026-01-29

最新评论