【】
Following a much buzzed-about trailer, Alex Garland's political action thriller Civil Warhad its world premiere at SXSW last Thursday, garnering a slew of rave reviews. The reaction online since then — both to the movie itself and reviews out of the film festival — have been divisive, which might have been Garland's purpose.
Set during a second American Civil War in a not-so-distant future, the film follows four journalists (Kirsten Dunst, Wagner Moura, Priscilla's Cailee Spaeny, and Stephen McKinley Henderson) on a road trip through the war-torn U.S. on a quest to interview the president (Nick Offerman) before secessionist forces invade Washington, D.C.
SEE ALSO:'Civil War' review: Alex Garland's latest is more 'Men,' less 'Ex Machina'The A24 film doesn't open in theaters until April 12. But that hasn't stopped social media users from conversing about the film from the title alone.
With reviews out of SXSW confirming that the movie is about the power of journalism rather than politics, some on social are going to war over it.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Maybe "going to war" is a bit hyperbolic. But having seen Civil Warmyself at its SXSW premiere, it's strange to see such opinionated takes ahead of its wide release. These divisive reactions might support Garland's point about the dangers of an "us versus them" mentality, whatever the politics. (Though personally, I found the film's apolitical approach unconvincing.)
To begin with, there was a lot of confusion about why California and Texas would team up in a civil war together.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Others state that because the film's focus is on war journalism, any debate about the movie's politics is deliberately missing the point. Or they suggest that negative reactions to the movie's apolitical approach have drawn ire because Garland didn't validate the political stance of the viewers as they thought he should.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
However, some felt it was weird to release this film during an election year and not have anything to say but "both sides bad."
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Garland knows his film will be divisive; he admitted as much in his interview with The Hollywood Reportersaying that the film is intentionally "trying to create a conversation about political divisiveness" that "vilifies the other side." Whether or not that decision to stir the pot will be good for the film's box office remains to be seen. You'll just have to wait to see Civil War yourself.
Civil War hits theaters on April 12.
TopicsFilmSocial MediaPolitics
相关文章

One of the most controversial power struggles in media comes to a close
One of the world's biggest media companies has been embroiled in a complex personal and professional2026-10-31
Why podcasts are so popular and what the format needs to grow
Are podcasts just having a moment? Almost two years ago, the true crime podcast Serial enthralled pe2026-10-31
Your mail will live long and prosper with new 'Star Trek' stamps
The U.S. Postal service has just joined Star Trek's50-year-and-counting mission.The iconic space exp2026-10-31
Starbucks has a spicy new fall drink to challenge the beloved PSL
NEW YORK CITY — Fall is three weeks away, so naturally the Pumpkin Spice Latte is already show2026-10-31
This coloring book is here for all your relationship goals
LONDON -- We are living through the golden age of celebrity relationships. Gone are the days of tort2026-10-31
Shakespeare's 'black is beautiful' sonnet gets Indigenous translation
Most of the time, Australian panel show Q&Ais frustrating, but every once in a while something m2026-10-31

最新评论